Skip to content

Add Emeritus Core Developers table to core-team/team-log - #1974

Open
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
vstinner:emeritus
Open

vstinner wants to merge 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
vstinner:emeritus

Conversation

@vstinner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

List core developers who left the team in a separated Emeritus Core Developers table.

List core developers who left the team in a separated Emeritus Core
Developers table.
@read-the-docs-community

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation build overview

📚 CPython devguide | 🛠️ Build #35852452 | 📁 Comparing 21a419e against latest (8c852bd)

  🔍 Preview build  

1 file changed
± core-team/team-log/index.html

@vstinner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Currently, it's uneasy for me to distinguish Core Developers who are still in the team from the ones who left in https://devguide.python.org/core-team/team-log/ table. I propose moving Core Developers who left the team to a new Emeritus Core Developers table.

Having a separated table would help me to have an idea of how many core developers are currently active (and how many left) which an useful information to me.

See also the related Steering Council ticket which uses the "Emeritus committers" term: Remove commit bit from inactive core devs as part of SC elections.

This change depends on https://github.com/python/voters/pull/140 (in the private voters repository) to generate core-team/core-team.csv and core-team/emeritus-core-team.csv.

Comment thread core-team/team-log.rst
:file: core-team.csv
:encoding: "utf-8"

Emeritus Core Developers

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Emeritus Core Developers
Emeritus Members

We've mostly been moving away from the "Core Developers" term to "Core Team Members"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants